All Options Are On the Table

MSM’s ongoing positioning of HRC as the heir apparent to the imperial Bush-Clinton-Bush dynasty continues to weave and cast veil upon veil of glutinous gauze over the true mechanisms of these nefarious US administrations.

Disgracefully, Senator Clinton is allowed sans challenge to conflate her own experience in international affairs with her 8 years as First Lady in the White House.

Okay. So lets give her that.

Lets say that HRC was right in there when plans were rolled out for the WTO, NAFTA, and the China whitewash. She okayed the government’s decision to militarily back anti-Sadaam forces in a post Desert Storm coup; then decided against it, a decision which lead to massive bloodletting by the Iraqi dictator. She agreed not to engage supplemental US troops to assist in Somalia’s Blackhawk Down disaster and pulled all US troops out soon afterwards. She did nothing after the Cole was attacked because there just wasn’t enough evidence. She had Bin Laden in sight. But called off the strike. She flip-flopped on the US role in Bosnia, refused to send assistance to Rwanda.

And her administration was well aware prior to 2000 of PNACs plan to restructure the Middle East via Iraq, having received a personal letter from the group and then introducing the Iraq Liberation Act through which $97 million was appropriated for various clandestine operations inside the borders of Iraq. As Senator, Clinton most probably cast one of the most informed votes signaling the go-ahead for the Iraq invasion. This "If I knew then what I know now" is ludicrous.

But the most shocking recent Clinton arabesque is her absurdity of her position relative to Senator Obama’s decision to remove the nuclear option from the table.

Here’s Clinton in Feb. at AIPAC.

"U.S. policy must be clear and unequivocal: We cannot, we should not, we must not permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons," she said. "In dealing with this threat ... no option can be taken off the table."

(And all the Dem. Candidates were towing this line for some time, all undoubtedly mindful of the Pentagon’s plan to go nuclear in an attempt to wipe out Iran’s nuclear arsenal.)

In parsing the above quote, pay special attention to "we must not permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons"

Why isn’t anyone asking her about ‘her’ administration’s transfer of classified blueprints to Iran paving the way for them to advance their nuclear capabilities? ("State of War" by James Risen, the New York Times reporter)

And why her administration also provided China with advanced missile technology and provided North Korea with nuclear technology enabling them to develop nuclear weapons?
See

What exactly IS going on here? Given her WH experience it’s easy to understand why she didn’t have to read the Patriot Act before signing it: the 1996 Antiterrorism Act was a first draft See Village Voice & Clinton’s1996 Antiterrorism ActSee Village Voice & Clinton’s1996 Antiterrorism Act

All this talk about Obama’s being naïve and lacking experience. How quickly we forget the shortcomings of Mr. Clinton whose lack of foreign policy experience certainly did not disqualify him in Mrs. Clinton’s eyes for being ‘THE MAN’ for the job during that campaign.
Note how Bill waffled back and forth on his foreign policy agenda during his campaign: Re the first Gulf War: "I agree with the arguments of the people in the minority on the resolution -- that we should give sanctions more time and maybe even explore a full-scale embargo ... before we go to war ... I guess I would have voted with the majority if it was a close vote. But I agree with the argument the minority made" (Arkansas Gazette, 1/15/91)."
See

And what about the Clinton’s experience with Halliburton? Most assuredly, according to her POV, she must have been privy to the fact that Halliburton’s revenue from the Defense Dept doubled over a 2-year period during her administration.

"In 1998, Halliburton's total revenue was $14.5 billion, which included $284 million of Pentagon contracts. Two years later, Halliburton’s DoD contracts more than doubled."
See

MSM, read our lips: Americans DO NOT want a North American Union; they do not want a one world government. They do NOT want a nuclear war. They do not want another ‘phantom puppet president’ whose rise to international notoriety coincides with the conflagration of an ever-swelling noblesse elite, an elite in which the Clintons uncategorically number themselves.

Obviously, MSM isn’t going to look beneath the voluminous veils of deceit to find out what’s really going on here. Has anyone thought to notice the similarities between the grooming job done on Hillary and the alien-esque aura of Condi Rice? No wonder gender isn’t an issue in this campaign. The Clinton Phenomena is so perfectly cast it appears in its final stages of hardening, capable of sustaining its shape sans the mold.

It’s no wonder the best the Republicans are offering in 08 is a soon-to-be ‘MKUltrad’ Fred Thompson and an alleged former Mafiosa NY mayor running on the imprint of his toxic 911 halo. They don’t need a candidate. They have Hillary. And GE, Times Warner, Disney and News Corp continue to frame the news as if her presidency is a fait accompli.

Would that we could impeach the whole lot of them!